Cover of: Genderstanding Jesus | Meryl James-Sebro Read Online

Genderstanding Jesus

  • 902 Want to read
  • ·
  • 26 Currently reading

Published by TEACH Services Inc. .
Written in English


  • Women"s Studies - General,
  • Social Science,
  • Christianity,
  • Feminism,
  • Jesus Christ,
  • Religious aspects,
  • Teachings,
  • Women,
  • Sociology

Book details:

The Physical Object
Number of Pages172
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL12205244M
ISBN 10157258324X
ISBN 109781572583245

Download Genderstanding Jesus


  Genderstanding Leadership: Women a Key Force in Bringing Relevance to 21St-Century Christianity - Kindle edition by Meryl James-Sebro. Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading Genderstanding Leadership: Women a Key Force in Bringing Relevance to 21St-Century : Meryl James-Sebro. Genderstanding Leadership: Women a Key Force in Bringing Relevance to 21st-Century Christianity - eBook () by Meryl James-Sebro Hear about sales, receive special offers & more. You can unsubscribe at any : Ebook. Read "Genderstanding Leadership Women a Key Force in Bringing Relevance to 21St-Century Christianity" by Meryl James-Sebro available from Rakuten Kobo. Genderstanding Leadership: Power to the Pew! questions the gender gap between Christian ideology and practice. It challe Brand: Westbow Press. Genderstanding Jesus: Women in His View In a world that is increasingly linking faith to social, economic, cultural and political inequality, and often holds religion responsible for gender inequality, Genderstanding Jesus asks a thought-provoking question: "What would Jesus do about gender relations?"Genderstanding Jesus examines the.

  My first book, Genderstanding Jesus: Women in His View, documents the ways in which Jesus not only honored women, but went out of His way to break through social, cultural, and religious traditions to exonerate, liberate, and empower women. Moreover, He used women in His service to transform society and spread His Good News. Jesus's Countercultural View of Women. The place of women in the first-century Roman world and in Judaism has been well-documented and set forth in several recent books. 1 Most frequently, women were regarded as second-class citizens. Jesus’s regard for . Some readers mistake Mary for the prostitute who washed Jesus’ feet (Luke ), but no biblical support equates the two. Mary witnessed Jesus’ death, and was the first of the women to see the resurrected Jesus (John ). When all the disciples except for John had fled during Jesus’ trial and execution, she stood by to comfort him. Jesus recognizes immediately that it is a set-up. He knows that if he pronounces the sentence of death on the woman, he is flouting Roman law. If he lets her off, he is flouting the Law of Moses. What is he to do? Instead of answering, Jesus does something unexpected – always a good ploy. He bends down and writes with his finger on the stone.

The non-canonical 3rd-century text Gospel of Philip describes Jesus's relationship with Mary Magdalene using Coptic variants of the Greek κοινωνός (koinōnos).That work uses cognates of koinōnos and Coptic equivalents to refer both to the literal pairing of men and women in marriage and sexual intercourse, but also metaphorically, referring to a spiritual partnership, and the. Attacks upon the Sabbath throughout the ages have been numerous and persistent, and they have all been grounded upon human reasoning as against the command of God. Men can see no reason why any other day than one commanded by God is not just as good. Men cannot see why one day in .   JSTOR Daily provides context for current events using scholarship found in JSTOR, a digital library of academic journals, books, and other material. We publish articles grounded in peer-reviewed research and provide free access to that research for all of our readers. “Administrators grew wary of the emotional bonds that formed between [US military] men and Korean houseboys when bunking together. The paternal role taken on by soldiers was not conducive to military goals; they were there to fight a war, not act as fathers to Korean children, commanders argued.